We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Dr. Justin Lehmiller

The State of Sex Education in the United States in 2020

In this blog post Dr. Justin Lehmiller considers the state of american sex education in 2020, including an infographic for a closer look at how variable sex education is throughout the nation today.

Justin Lehmiller will be discussing relationship and sexual education with Cynthia Graham, editor of The Journal of Sex Research in our Twinterview on September 21st. Follow the conversation on Routledge Education Research with #TandFChatRSE. 

Dr. Justin Lehmiller is a Research Fellow at The Kinsey Institute. He is the author of more than 50 academic publications, two textbooks, and the popular blog Sex and Psychology. His latest book is Tell Me What You Want: The Science of Sexual Desire and How It Can Help You Improve Your Sex Life

Teens across the United States have wildly inconsistent experiences with sex education. Currently, 20 states do not even require that sex education be taught at all, and even in those states that mandate sex ed, the information teachers provide does not necessarily have to be useful. In fact, in thirteen of the states that require sex education, the materials provided do not even have to be medically accurate! 

American sex education is not sufficient, which is a big part of the reason why it continues to have one of the highest rates of teen pregnancies and STIs in the industrialized world. Check out the infographic for a closer look at how variable sex education is throughout the nation today.

Sex education is vital to adolescent sexual health, but content matters. For example, research has found that the U.S. states with the most abstinence-only programs actually have the highest rates of teen pregnancy [1]. By contrast, comprehensive sex education is not only linked to lower rates of teen pregnancy [2], but also to lower rates of STI-risk behavior [3]. The evidence is overwhelming that simply teaching students to avoid sex until marriage is linked to worse outcomes than teaching them practical sexual skills and information.

However, comprehensive sex education offers a number of benefits beyond improved sexual health. For example, these programs are also linked to greater feelings of sexual empowerment by shifting traditional views of men and women [4]. This, in turn, can facilitate healthier sexual relationships.

Without school-based sex education, adolescents are likely to turn to unreliable and inaccurate sources of information about sex, including peers and porn. Students want useful school-based sex ed, too. In fact, research has found that students tend to see school as their single most important source of sexual health information [5].

Parents generally want schools to provide this information as well, and this is one area where most Americans across the political spectrum agree: research finds that Republicans and Democrats alike support comprehensive sex education [6].

In order for change to occur, we need to work with the people who have the power to change it. If you want to help facilitate change, start by getting involved at the local level, because this is where most decisions about sex education content are actually made. Take interest in what your kids are learning (or failing to learn) about sex in school. Identify deficiencies in the program and follow-up with your local school board.

References:

[1] Stanger-Hall, K.F., Hall, D.W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLoS ONE 6(10): e24658. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024658

[2] Kohler, P.K., Manhart, L.E., & Lafferty, W.E. (2008). Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health42, 344-351. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.026

[3] Stanger-Hall, K.F., Hall, D.W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLoS ONE 6(10): e24658. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024658

[4] Grose, R. G., Grabe, S., & Kohfeldt, D. (2014). Sexual education, gender ideology, and youth sexual empowerment. The Journal of Sex Research51(7), 742-753.

[5] Seiler-Ramadas, R., Grabovac, I., Niederkrotenthaler, T., & Dorner, T. E. (2020). Adolescents’ Perspective on Their Sexual Knowledge and the Role of School in Addressing Emotions in Sex Education: An Exploratory Analysis of Two School Types in Austria. The Journal of Sex Research.

[6] Kantor, L., & Levitz, N. (2017). Parents’ views on sex education in schools: How much do Democrats and Republicans agree? PLOS ONE , 12 (7), e0180250.

Justin Lehmiller Twitter