We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Panta Rhei Article Collection

The Scientific Decade 2013–2022 of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) “Panta Rhei – Everything Flows” is dedicated to increasing our knowledge of interactions and feedbacks between hydrology and society. Research is focused on processes and drivers of change in the water cycle with a strong consideration of the interactions with the changing human system. The general objective is to improve our descriptions and predictions of water resources dynamics to support sustainable societal development under global conditions (Montmari et al. 2013,  McMilan et al. 2016). Read the full editorial here.

 

Below you can read a collection of research articles, reviews and opinion papers from the Panta Rhei Scientific Decade 2013-2022, which are currently FREE to access.

 

Panta Rhei Article Collection - The Scientific Decade 2013-2022

TitleAuthorVolumeIssue
Kernel distributed residual function in a revised multiple order autoregressive model and its applications in hydrologyNesa Ilich, Amr Gharib, Evan G. R. Davies6312
Tracer-based estimation of temporal variation of water sources: an insight from supra- and subglacial environmentsNaveen Kumar, AL. Ramanathan, Tirumalesh Keesari, et al.6311
Multi-objective autocalibration of SWAT model for improved low flow performance for a small snowfed catchmentVinod Chilkoti, Tirupati Bolisetti & Ram Balachandar6310
Evaluation of four hydrological models for operational flood forecasting in a Canadian Prairie watershedFisaha Unduche, Habtamu Tolossa,
Degefa Senbeta, et al.
638
Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexusJ. Liu, H. Yang, C. Cudennec, et al. 6211

Panta Rhei Opinion Papers Series

A list of opinion papers, replies and discussions

 

 

Title AuthorVolume Issue
How to improve attribution of changes in drought and flood impactsHeidi Kreibich, Veit Blauhut, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, et al. 641
Prediction of streamflow regimes over large geographical areas: interpolated flow–duration curves for the Danube regionA. Castellarin, S. Persiano, A. Pugliese, et al. 636
Diagnosing drought using the downstreamness concept: the effect of reservoir networks on drought evolutionPieter R. van Oel, Eduardo S. P. R. Martins, Alexandre C. Costa, et al. 637
A need for incentivizing field hydrology, especially in an era of open data: discussion of “The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey”Scott T. Allen & Wouter R. Berghuijs 638
Incentives for field hydrology and data sharing: collaboration and compensation: reply to “A need for incentivizing field hydrology, especially in an era of open data”Theresa Blume, Ilja van Meerveld & Markus Weiler638
Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology: discussion of “The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey"Tim van Emmerik, Andrea Popp, Anna Solcerova, et al. 638
Why and when it is useful to publish and share inconclusive results and failures: reply to “Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology”Theresa Blume, Ilja van Meerveld & Markus Weiler638
What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology? Discussion of “Prediction in a socio-hydrological world”Lieke Anna Melsen, Jeroen Vos & Rutgerd Boelens639
Moving socio-hydrologic modelling forward: unpacking hidden assumptions, values and model structure by engaging with stakeholders: reply to “What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology?”V. Srinivasan, M. Sanderson, M. Garcia, et al. 63 9
Discussion of “Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus"Olli Varis & Marko Keskinen 6312
Discussion of “Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus”Alexandra Nauditt 6312
Epistemological dimensions of the water–energy–food nexus approach: reply to discussions of “Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus"C. Cudennec, J. Liu, J. Qi, et al. 6312
Discussion of “Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example"Maurits W. Ertsen6313-14
Reply to Discussion of “Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example"Ida K. Westerberg, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Keith J. Beven, et al. 63 13-14
Scientific debate of Panta Rhei research – how to advance our knowledge of changes in hydrology and society?Heidi Kreibich, Tobias Krueger, Anne Van Loon, et al. 623
The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community surveyTheresa Blume, Ilja van Meerveld & Markus Weiler623
Prediction in a socio-hydrological worldV. Srinivasan, M. Sanderson, M. Garcia, et al. 623
Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change exampleIda K. Westerberg, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Keith J.Beven, et al. 6211
Is anthropogenic land subsidence a possible driver of riverine flood-hazard dynamics? A case study in Ravenna, ItalyFrancesca Carisi, Alessio Domeneghetti, Maria Gabriella Gaeta, et al. 6215
Panta Rhei 2013–2015: global perspectives on hydrology, society and changeHilary McMillan, Alberto Montanari, Christophe Cudennec, et al. 617
Data-driven modelling approaches for socio-hydrology: opportunities and challenges within the Panta Rhei Science PlanN. J. Mount, H. R. Maier, E. Toth, et al. 617
The seventh facet of uncertainty: wrong assumptions, unknowns and surprises in the dynamics of human–water systemsGiuliano Di Baldassarre, Luigia Brandimarte & Keith Beven619
Adaptation of water resources systems to changing society and environment: a statement by the International Association of Hydrological SciencesSerena Ceola, Alberto Montanari, Tobias Krueger, et al. 6116
Testing the robustness of the physically-based ECOMAG model with respect to changing conditions Evaluation de la robustesse du modèle à base physique ECOMAG dans un contexte de changement de l’environnementA. Gelfan, Yu Motovilov, I. Krylenko, et al. 607-8