Panta Rhei Article Collection

The Scientific Decade 2013–2022 of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) “Panta Rhei – Everything Flows” is dedicated to increasing our knowledge of interactions and feedbacks between hydrology and society. Research is focused on processes and drivers of change in the water cycle with a strong consideration of the interactions with the changing human system. The general objective is to improve our descriptions and predictions of water resources dynamics to support sustainable societal development under global conditions (Montmari et al. 2013, McMilan et al. 2016). Read the full editorial here.

Below you can read a collection of research articles, reviews and opinion papers from the Panta Rhei Scientific Decade 2013-2022, which are currently FREE to access.

Panta Rhei Article Collection - The Scientific Decade 2013-2022

Title	Author	Volume	Issue
Kernel distributed residual function in a revised multiple order autoregressive model and its applications in hydrology	Nesa Ilich, Amr Gharib, Evan G. R. Davies	63	12
Tracer-based estimation of temporal variation of water sources: an insight from supra- and subglacial environments	Naveen Kumar, AL. Ramanathan, Tirumalesh Keesari, et al.	63	11
Multi-objective autocalibration of SWAT model for improved low flow performance for a small snowfed catchment	Vinod Chilkoti, Tirupati Bolisetti & Ram Balachandar	63	10
Evaluation of four hydrological models for operational flood forecasting in a Canadian Prairie watershed	Fisaha Unduche, Habtamu Tolossa, Degefa Senbeta, et al.	63	8
Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus	J. Liu, H. Yang, C. Cudennec, et al.	62	11

Title	Author	Volume	Issue
How to improve attribution of changes in drought and flood impacts	Heidi Kreibich, Veit Blauhut, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, et al.	64	1
Prediction of streamflow regimes over large geographical areas: interpolated flow–duration curves for the Danube region	A. Castellarin, S. Persiano, A. Pugliese, et al.	63	6
Diagnosing drought using the downstreamness concept: the effect of reservoir networks on drought evolution	Pieter R. van Oel, Eduardo S. P. R. Martins, Alexandre C. Costa, et al.	63	7
A need for incentivizing field hydrology, especially in an era of open data: discussion of “The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey”	Scott T. Allen & Wouter R. Berghuijs	63	8
Incentives for field hydrology and data sharing: collaboration and compensation: reply to “A need for incentivizing field hydrology, especially in an era of open data”	Theresa Blume, Ilja van Meerveld & Markus Weiler	63	8
Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology: discussion of “The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey"	Tim van Emmerik, Andrea Popp, Anna Solcerova, et al.	63	8
Why and when it is useful to publish and share inconclusive results and failures: reply to “Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology”	Theresa Blume, Ilja van Meerveld & Markus Weiler	63	8
What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology? Discussion of “Prediction in a socio-hydrological world”	Lieke Anna Melsen, Jeroen Vos & Rutgerd Boelens	63	9
Moving socio-hydrologic modelling forward: unpacking hidden assumptions, values and model structure by engaging with stakeholders: reply to “What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology?”	V. Srinivasan, M. Sanderson, M. Garcia, et al.	63	9
Discussion of “Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus"	Olli Varis & Marko Keskinen	63	12
Discussion of “Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus”	Alexandra Nauditt	63	12
Epistemological dimensions of the water–energy–food nexus approach: reply to discussions of “Challenges in operationalizing the water–energy–food nexus"	C. Cudennec, J. Liu, J. Qi, et al.	63	12
Discussion of “Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example"	Maurits W. Ertsen	63	13-14
Reply to Discussion of “Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example"	Ida K. Westerberg, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Keith J. Beven, et al.	63	13-14
Scientific debate of Panta Rhei research – how to advance our knowledge of changes in hydrology and society?	Heidi Kreibich, Tobias Krueger, Anne Van Loon, et al.	62	3
The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey	Theresa Blume, Ilja van Meerveld & Markus Weiler	62	3
Prediction in a socio-hydrological world	V. Srinivasan, M. Sanderson, M. Garcia, et al.	62	3
Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example	Ida K. Westerberg, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Keith J.Beven, et al.	62	11
Is anthropogenic land subsidence a possible driver of riverine flood-hazard dynamics? A case study in Ravenna, Italy	Francesca Carisi, Alessio Domeneghetti, Maria Gabriella Gaeta, et al.	62	15
Panta Rhei 2013–2015: global perspectives on hydrology, society and change	Hilary McMillan, Alberto Montanari, Christophe Cudennec, et al.	61	7
Data-driven modelling approaches for socio-hydrology: opportunities and challenges within the Panta Rhei Science Plan	N. J. Mount, H. R. Maier, E. Toth, et al.	61	7
The seventh facet of uncertainty: wrong assumptions, unknowns and surprises in the dynamics of human–water systems	Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Luigia Brandimarte & Keith Beven	61	9
Adaptation of water resources systems to changing society and environment: a statement by the International Association of Hydrological Sciences	Serena Ceola, Alberto Montanari, Tobias Krueger, et al.	61	16
Testing the robustness of the physically-based ECOMAG model with respect to changing conditions Evaluation de la robustesse du modèle à base physique ECOMAG dans un contexte de changement de l’environnement	A. Gelfan, Yu Motovilov, I. Krylenko, et al.	60	7-8

Panta Rhei Article Collection

Panta Rhei Article Collection - The Scientific Decade 2013-2022

Panta Rhei Opinion Papers Series

A list of opinion papers, replies and discussions