We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Davidge Award

Advances in Applied Ceramics: Structural, Functional and Bioceramics

About the prize

The Davidge Award is an annual prize for the best literature review by a PhD student on an innovative topic in ceramics.

The award is run and judged by the Editors of Advances in Applied Ceramics: Structural, Functional and Bioceramics (AAC), the specialist ceramics journal of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining (IOM3), and is open to postgraduates studying for a materials science and engineering related qualification at any academic institution worldwide.

The Award commemorates the distinguished contributions to the science and application of ceramics made by the late Roger Davidge (1936–97). During a career spent largely at AERE Harwell during the laboratory’s heyday, and also at Leeds and Oxford universities. He pioneered the introduction of fracture mechanics concepts to ceramics. His research in areas that included fracture, toughness, fatigue, thermal shock and the statistics of mechanical fracture made an outstanding contribution to knowledge on these subjects.

2017 Winning entry: Thomas Scott, University of Oxford (thomas.scott@materials.ox.ac.uk), ‘ The influence of microstructure on the mechanical properties of polycrystalline diamond - a literature review’ (pending publication)
2017 Commended entry: Debasmita Dwibedi, Indian Institute of Science (debasmitadwibedi09@gmail.com), ‘From cation flexibility to multifaceted industrial adoptability: A voyage to the resourceful spinel

Advances in Applied Ceramics

Language: en-US

Publisher: tandf

Visit Journal Articles

Important Infomation

Full instructions for preparation of the full review will be provided with the invitation, but it is important to note the following points when planning your entry.

The maximum length of reviews is 7000 words, and the scope must be carefully considered in view of this restriction. Focused reviews of novel or developing areas are preferable to broader reviews of areas covered by existing reviews or monographs.

A literature review is not the same as a thesis introduction. The review must be self-contained and critical (i.e. it should comment on and interpret the literature) and must not refer to unpublished work. Basic theory and established knowledge should be covered briefly, with references to existing reviews and textbooks. The review should focus on unresolved questions and conclude by identifying areas where further work is required to advance the field.

Credit will be given for the effective use of illustrations to convey key concepts and to compare and synthesize data from different sources.

The judges’ decision is final and absolute in all respects. Publication in AAC may be subject to the completion of revisions recommended by the judges or specialist reviewers. Once a review has been accepted, it is the candidate’s responsibility to obtain any necessary permission to reproduce figures or other material for which he or she does not hold copyright.

 

Further information and queries:
Please contact: Rose Worrell, Taylor & Francis, 297 Euston Road, London NW2 3AQ tel. +44 (0)20 7017 5806, email rose.worrell@tandf.co.uk