Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems Best Paper Award
About the Award
The journal Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems recognises excellence in research through the annual Best Paper Award. The award is given for the work published in the previous year that best meets the goal of the journal to publish work of long-lasting value in the study of civil engineering and environmental systems. There is no nomination process and all papers will be considered. The editors will make a decision on the award, and will call in members of the editorial board to assist in the case of potential conflicts of interest. Offers for sponsorship for the annual award will be considered. The first award was made for work published in 2019. For more information on making a submission to the journal, please visit the journal website.
Sundling and Szentes’ paper develops interesting insights into complex, intractable, open-ended, and unpredictable systems where the most crucial aspect is the human aspect fueled by the diversity of the stakeholders. Systems thinking is challenging in such conditions and that is where the concept of wicked problems is shown to be quite useful. The paper shows its potential as an analytical tool, a creative tool, and an emancipatory tool in the context of renovation decisions within “wicked” urban environments with conflicting technical viability, financial viability, and environmental performance objectives.
|2021||Rikard Sundling and Henrik Szentes||Why are we not renovating more? An elaboration of the wicked problem of renovating apartment buildings||38||3|
|2020||David G. Carmichael||Bias and decision making – an overview systems explanation||37||1-2|
|2020||David Elms||Discussion of ‘Bias and decision making – an overview systems explanation’ by David G. Carmichael, Civil engineering and environmental systems 2020, v. 37, nos. 1-2, 48–61||37||3|
|2020||David G. Carmichael||Author's reply to: David Elms’ discussion of ‘Bias and decision making – an overview systems explanation’||37||3|
|2019||Linda Nielsen, Sebastian Tølbøll Glavind, Jianjun Qin & Michael H. Faber||Faith and fakes – dealing with critical information in decision analysis||36||1|