Ethnic and Racial Studies – our hub for new researchers

Tools, tips, and journal insights to help you publish your work with confidence.

Ethnic and Racial Studies is the leading international journal for the analysis of the role of race, racism, ethnicity, migration and forms of ethno-nationalism. These social phenomena are at the heart of many of the major social and political issues in the modern world. As the leading journal in these areas, we seek to provide an interdisciplinary academic forum for the publication of original research and theoretical analysis, drawing particularly on sociology, social policy, anthropology, political science, international relations, geography, history, social psychology and cultural studies.  Ethnic and Racial Studies actively welcomes contributions from new and emerging researchers, fostering the next generation of scholarship in these vital fields.

Born out of the 2024 International Editorial Board Meeting our members strongly suggested additional resources for new and emerging researchers to help navigate the complexities of journal publishing with Ethnic and Racial Studies. We hope you will find answers here to all your questions . If that’s not the case, do email us at [email protected] so we can help. We’re a friendly team and very responsive. ERS works closely with Taylor&Francis/Routledge.  Many of the links we’ve included below will take you to the Author Services area of the T&F website.

Broadly speaking, we consider anyone up to 10 years post PhD to be a new and emerging/early-career researcher (ECR), and you are most welcome here at ERS. Our Editorial Board includes many new and emerging researchers including our Outreach Coordinator, Thi Bogossian.  In fact, over half of our submissions are authored/co-authored by ECRs.

Frequently asked questions

Please browse our FAQs. We have put together a series of questions to ‘de-mystify’ publishing in ERS and dispel the myth(s) that good quality work from new and emerging researchers won’t be accepted in prestigious journals!

Get insights on the submission and editing process, find how-to’s and take a look into how you can become a peer reviewer!

How many actual submissions are received each year?
 In 2025 we received over 1300 submissions.

What submission system do you use?
All submissions are managed via ScholarOne.

Can I email my submission to you?
We can’t accept submissions via email.

Do you have any instructions for using ScholarOne?
Yes, of course. You can find more information here. Please note that we don’t require a cover page at ERS. The files you upload should not contain author details.

My m/s has multiple authors, how do we submit?
Any author can prepare the submission and during the process they will need to designate the corresponding author. Thereafter we will send all communications to this corresponding author.

Journals can take ages to make a decision, can I submit my article to several journals at the same time?
Simultaneous submission is not permitted nor advised and during submission you’ll be required to declare that the m/s is not under consideration elsewhere.

I’ve submitted but I’m unsure of the next steps.
First of all you should have received an automated acknowledgement confirming your submission. Please check your junk folder! If you can’t locate this email contact the journal office so we can check we have the right contact details for you. Your m/s will now be screened by the Editorial Assistant to ensure it conforms to our submission criteria. It is then forwarded to the Editor in Chief who assesses its suitability for peer review. This process takes less than one week and we will confirm the outcome to you within this time.

Can you explain the desk reject process?
Prior to peer review, the Editor in Chief reviews all papers to ensure the submission is suitable for full peer review. If that is not the case the paper is rejected. At this early stage in the process this is known as a Desk Reject. ERS processes desk rejects within four days of submission.

Is there one editor who handles all papers who decides what to publish?
Yes, at ERS we have one very experienced Editor in Chief – at this early stage he will either suggest some suitable reviewers or recommend a desk reject. Authors are notified of both outcomes within a week of submission.

How are reviewers chosen?
Reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with the journal. ERS has an extensive database of reviewers with over 25K experts – this is a great resource for reviewer selection. We also expect our published authors to contribute to peer review. Their selection is based on their knowledge in the field of research, their independence from the author of the paper (and any related institutions), their ability to evaluate the paper fully and fairly and their availability to assess the paper within the allotted timeframe. Although reviewers’ recommendations are highly valued in the peer review process, the final decision on a manuscript always rests with the Editor. If you are suitably qualified and would like to be considered as a possible referee for papers submitted to the journal, we would be pleased to hear from you. You can email us at [email protected].

How many people will review each paper?
We usually have two reviewers reporting on each paper and making a recommendation about its suitability for publication. Each reviewer is asked to submit their report within one month.

How long is this going to take?
The average time from submission to peer review to 1st decision is two months.

It’s been a while since I submitted how can I find out what’s happening?
You’re always welcome to email the Journal office ([email protected]) who will check the status of your submission and get back to you.

Who decides what to publish?
The final decision rests with the Editor in Chief being an expert in the field and makes unbiased and independent decisions.

What are the possible decisions that the Editor will make?
Accept:
The paper is suitable for publication in its current form.
Provisional Accept: Authors are asked to optimize their paper for publication. At this stage requested changes are mainly stylistic. Authors have one month to resubmit.
Minor Revision: The paper will be ready for publication after light revisions. In the case of this recommendation the final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief. Authors have two months to resubmit.
Major Revision: The paper needs substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, widening of the literature review, or rewriting sections of the text. In the case of this recommendation the final decision about the paper is made by the Editor-in -Chief. Authors have three months to resubmit.
Revise and Resubmit: The paper requires a substantial revision to remedy weaknesses in the data analysis, the literature review or the structure of the paper. In the case of this recommendation the paper will be returned to the same reviewers for a 2nd round of peer review. (If the original reviewers are not available or recommended rejection we will source a replacement). Authors have four months to resubmit. See sample decision letter below.
Reject: The paper isn’t suitable for publication with this journal, or the revisions are too fundamental for the submission to continue. Resubmission is not permitted. See sample decision letter below.

I’ve been asked to respond in full to the reviewers’ comments. How can I get more advice?
Please see this detailed advice – https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/blog/peer-review/how-to-respond-to-reviewer-comments/

Is there any extra support for ECRs?
Yes of course. Please send an email to the Journal office with your query.

I don’t think I can complete all the revisions within the alloted time, what shall I do?
Please contact the Journal office and they’ll be able to help.

My m/s has been rejected can I resubmit?
At ERS we don’t offer a resubmit option once a m/s has been rejected but please don’t be deterred from submitting new papers in the future.

How do I respond to a reject decision?
Please don’t be deterred! Do bear in mind that the acceptance rate at ERS is below 15%.

Could I become a peer reviewer?
Yes, absolutely. We need you! Create an account on ScholarOne and list all your areas of expertise – that’s how we match reviewers to a m/s.

How do I know ERS is the right journal for my article? 
Check the Aims and Scope in a first instance. You could also try using this nifty Journal Suggester tool: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-your-research/choosing-a-journal/journal-suggester/

I’ve read the ERS Aims and Scope but I’m still unsure…
Why not send a quick enquiry email to [email protected] and we can confirm one way or another

What is your acceptance rate?
The acceptance criteria are rigorous and in 2025 we published approximately 13% of submitted articles

What are the likely turnaround times?
You’ll know within one week of submission whether your article will be peer reviewed or not.  From submission to peer review to decision the average time is two months.

Do I have to follow a specific format and reference style?
ERS Authors can use any form or layout. There are no strict formatting requirements – we call this ‘Format Free’

How do I make sure I choose the right keywords?

Please consult our guidance.

Do you have any advice for writing titles or abstracts?
We do! – Please consult our guidance.

How many co-authors can I have?
There is no limit but do read our guidance on authorship.

What about publishing from my PhD?
Sure! Remember however that the audience for a journal article is different so it will need adapting and not just re-producing.

I’m not sure about ethics for authors.
Have a look at this infographic for guidance.

My research includes data from human participants, what do I need to do?
Please read the guidelines and then include a Statement of Ethics within your m/s (anonymized for peer review).

How do I actually anonymize my paper?
You’ll need to remove any mentions of your name and personal details on the initial submission. We’ll be collecting your contact details in the online submission process so they are not needed on the actual file you upload. If you’ve included a Statement of Ethics please remove your name, institution, approval number (use XXX or highlight in black). And if citing your own work please refer to it in the third person. At ERS we don’t require a cover page.

How do you measure wordcount?
Excluding figures and tables and using the Word Count feature in Microsoft Word, we check that the length of each submission does not exceed our upper limit of 9000 words.  If the length is excessive the m/s will be unsubmitted and send back to the author.

More information
For further advice, including AI, review this guidance.

Revise and Resubmit
Dear XXX Your above paper has been peer-reviewed by two external referees whose reports follow below. They have raised major concerns, particularly the comments from Referee 2, which we invite you to address in a substantial revision of your paper. This does not guarantee eventual acceptance and a resubmission will be subject to re-refereeing
before a decision is reached. If you are an early career researcher and this is one of your 1st peer-reviewed papers and you’d appreciate extra advice with this decision, please let us know. By clicking the following link https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rers XXX you will be taken directly to your submission on our ScholarOne site. Please work through each stage of the submission process and include a detailed response to the comments made by the reviewers in the space provided. Top tips for responding to your reviewers’ comments are available: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/blog/peerreview/how-to-respond-to-reviewer-comments/ There is a calendar reminder for your due date attached to this email for you to add to your own calendar if you wish.  Thank you for choosing Ethnic and Racial Studies. We do hope you will be able to undertake the additional work and look forward to receiving your revised paper.

Reject
Dear XXX The Editors have now completed the review of your above article. They are glad to have had the opportunity to consider it, and to aid in their decision making, they sent it to specialist referees whose comments follow below. Regrettably, based on the referees’ reports obtained, the Editors are unable to accept your article for publication. Ethnic and Racial Studies receives many more articles than it can publish, and therefore recommend you submit to another journal. (This tool from Taylor & Francis may be useful in locating alternative publications). Thank you for considering ETHNIC & RACIAL STUDIES. We are sorry to disappoint you on this occasion and wish you every success in getting your work published elsewhere.

Advice from our community of new and emerging researchers

David Kretschmer headshot

What it was like to publish in ERS – David Kretschmer

Publishing with Ethnic and Racial Studies as an Early Career Researcher (ECR) was both productive and enjoyable for me. From submission to publication, the Ethnic and Racial Studies editorial team was highly accessible and supportive, providing clear guidance and resources specifically tailored to ECRs. This transparent and encouraging environment helped alleviate much of the anxiety often associated with the publication process and made me feel recognized and respected as a researcher. The publication process was also swift, taking only about six months from submission to publication—a crucial factor, especially for ECRs. For these reasons, I highly recommend submitting your manuscripts to Ethnic and Racial Studies.

David’s top tips for publishing with Ethnic and Racial Studies

Assess the fit of your paper and follow the guidelines: Ethnic and Racial Studies offers detailed information on its topical scope, as well as clear submission guidelines. Be sure to review them closely to ensure your manuscript aligns well with the journal’s audience and standards.

Revise carefully: If invited to revise and resubmit, take time to thoughtfully address the reviewers’ comments. While you may not agree with every point, reviewers often raise issues that other readers might also find. Addressing these concerns can help make your manuscript more accessible to a broader audience.

My experience as an Early Career Researcher (ECR) peer reviewer Nicole Schwitter

While I was a third year PhD student at the University of Warwick, I was invited by the editorial team of Ethnic & Racial Studies to act as a peer reviewer. As an early career researcher, the opportunity to engage in peer review for the first time was exciting albeit somewhat intimidating—I questioned whether I knew enough to offer meaningful feedback. However, stepping into the role of a reviewer showed me that peer reviewing is not (just) about being an expert, but about critically engaging with research, asking the right questions, and contributing to the integrity and quality of the work published in our field.
Peer reviewing helped me see that the process is not reserved for senior academics; it is a collaborative effort where different perspectives, including those from ECRs, are highly valuable. The experience empowered me to see myself as part of the academic conversation, not just as a contributor of my own work, but as someone who could help shape the field through constructive feedback.

Nicole Schwitter headshot

Nicole’s top 3 tips for early career peer reviewers

You know more than you think
It is normal to feel unsure of yourself or experience imposter syndrome when starting out as a reviewer. You might wonder whether you know enough to evaluate a submitted manuscript. But the reality is, if you have been asked to review, it is because the editors believe you have something valuable to contribute. Do not underestimate your fresh perspective—being earlier in your career means you are often more up-to-date on cutting-edge methods and emerging literature. Trust your training and the critical thinking skills you have developed.

Think of it as a conversation, not a judgement
Peer reviewing is less about “grading” a paper and more about engaging in a dialogue with the authors (and ideally, with the editor and other peer reviewers). Imagine you are offering thoughtful feedback to a colleague helping to improve a manuscript reach its full potential, not critiquing from a distance. Be curious—ask yourself what you would want to know more about or what would make the argument stronger. The best reviews balance acknowledgment of what is strong with suggestions for improvement. It is also okay not to have all the answers when reviewing a manuscript. In fact, acknowledging uncertainty or gaps in your expertise is part of being a responsible reviewer. You can also let the editor know that you are an ECR and reviewing for the first (or second, or third) time, and they will appreciate your transparency. And keep in mind that peer reviewers are not the ones making the final decision: your role is to provide feedback that helps the editor weigh different perspectives from multiple reviewers. The editor’s decision also factors in the journal’s preferences, scope, and broader editorial strategy. Knowing this removes the pressure to deliver a ‘perfect’ review, and reframes it as a collaborative process, which benefits everyone involved.

Use It as a Learning Opportunity
Reviewing is one of the best ways to improve your own research. As you critically engage with someone else’s work, you will naturally sharpen your analytical skills and get a clearer sense of what makes a strong paper. You will also get an insider’s view of the review process, which will help you when your own work is under review. So, do not feel like you need to be an expert to review—use the opportunity to learn and grow. It is a win-win. My experience as an ECR peer reviewer for Ethnic & Racial Studies has been educational and rewarding. It gave me the confidence to trust my voice in the academic community, helped me become a more critical reader of research and allowed me to improve my own work by seeing what happens on the other side of the review process. I encourage other early career researchers to take up this role when offered the opportunity—it is a chance to engage with cutting-edge work and contribute to the advancement of our field. Peer reviewing helped me see that the process is not reserved for senior academics; it is a collaborative effort where different perspectives, including those from ECRs, are highly valuable. The experience empowered me to see myself as part of the academic conversation, not just as a contributor of my own work, but as someone who could help shape the field through constructive feedback.

Thi Bogossian screenshot

Writing a book review for ERS – Thi Bogossian

Hear directly from Thi Bogossian, a member of the International Editorial Board of Ethnic and Racial Studies, as they provide crucial information on how to write book reviews for ERS.

Explore a selection of articles from our new researchers

“It was hard work, and it is still hard work”: towards a fluid typology of Black (imprisoned) motherwork

Although there has been a growing body of matricentric penological scholarship in Britain, there remains a lack of theoretical consideration of the intersections between processes of racialization and motherhood in such contexts. 

Sanctioned discrimination: asylum seekers and the UK’s hostile environment

This article explores how the UK asylum system creates a sanctioned discrimination that racializes and marginalizes asylum seekers through legal, economic and moral exclusion.

Worth a try? Left-wing media’s discursive struggle on the hardened European asylum law

In Germany, dispute has risen around the New Pact on Migration and Asylum (NPMA), as it would violate human rights. These laws also find favor with left parts of the media. 

Connect with ERS

bluesky icon
linkedin icon
research gate icon
rocket ship in the palm of a person's hand

Publish your research

Get published with us today

lightbulb with finger pointed in air

Become a reviewer

Who – How – Why

Vibrant colors exploding into dust.

Expand your reach

SEO tips to increase your reach

Advice from the ERS office

ERS Editor John

We asked John, our Editor, what three things authors should bear in mind when preparing their article for ERS.

  • Think about what you want to say in your paper within 9000 words. What is your key argument? How do you support your argument?”

  • Organise your paper so that you have a clear opening, a middle and a conclusion that brings your argument together. Are the various parts of your paper linked together?

  • Familiarise yourself with recent volumes of the journal you are submitting to. Are there links between your paper and the topics covered by the journal?

ERS Journal Manager Celia

We asked Celia, our experienced Journal Manager (25 years at ERS!) for her top three pieces of advice:

  • Read the Instructions For Authors on our website before submitting your paper – does your paper fit our aims and scope, have you included all the required elements?”

  • Make sure you supply a version of your paper that is fully anonymised – including any ethics statements, references and acknowledgements – these can be changed at a later date.

  • If in doubt, then ask – send an email to the office if you need any further help or you have a question.

ERS Managing Editor Amanda

Amanda, the Managing Editor, also approaching 25 years at ERS, offers the following suggestions:

  • Ensure that your article is an excellent fit with the journal’s aims and scope.

  • Get a feel for the Journal prior to submission:

    Look at What material they publish – regular issues, special issues, book reviews?

    Offer Your services as a peer reviewer – this gives you a greater understanding of what will happen to your article when you submit

    Connect and follow the Journal on social media

  • Get feedback on your article before submitting:

    Choose someone close to the topic to check content clarity

    Choose someone outside your topic to check accessibility and argument flow

Early Career Board Members

Tahseen Shams headshot
Tahseen Shams

“I always look to ERS for cutting-edge critical research on race, ethnicity, and immigration. And I encourage my students to do so as well.”

Tahseen Shams, author of Here, There, and Elsewhere: The Making of Immigrant Identities in a Globalized World

Doğuş Şimşek headshot
Doğuş Şimşek

“Ethnic and Racial Studies remains, after 50 years, a leading journal for exploring the changing formations of race, ethnicity, and migration in a global context. It has shaped critical debates and brought together original insights, diverse voices, and critical perspectives from across disciplines and regions. The journal continues to publish theoretically rich and empirically grounded research that challenges conventional thinking and extends the boundaries of the field. What stands out is its global scope and openness to new ways of understanding social change, alongside its commitment to examining processes of racialisation, power, and inequality. Ethnic and Racial Studies remains an essential forum for dialogue, reflection, and debate on the complex and evolving realities of race and racism across different contexts.”

Doğuş Şimşek, Senior Lecturer, Kingston University London

Dr Irene Zempi headshot
Dr. Irene Zempi

“Being part of the Ethnic and Racial Studies Editorial Board has been a wonderful journey with inspirational colleagues! As the leading international journal in the areas of race, racism, ethnicity, migration and forms of ethno-nationalism, Ethnic and Racial Studies addresses these issues through publishing cutting edge empirical and theoretical work. It’s very rewarding to be involved in this journal. Happy 50th birthday Ethnic and Racial Studies!”

Dr Irene Zempi (She/Her), Associate Professor in Criminology, NTU

Upcoming events and conferences where the Editor in Chief and other ERS staff will be present and available to talk to

2026 BSA Annual Conference

8-10 April 2026
University of Manchester, UK

2026 Race & Media Conference

22-23 April 2026
University of Leeds, UK

2026 IMISCOE Spring Conference

29 June–2 July 2026
University of Girona

2026 ASA Annual Conference

7-11 August 2026
New York

More from ERS

ERS Martin Bulmer Prize

Martin Bulmer

More information on the prize here.

SHARE THIS PAGE